Apex Digest

Join Group
Agarawal Associates

Apex Digest

Supreme Court of India — Judgment Intelligence

5 judgments in Commercial law

Sorted by most recent

State of Haryana & Ors. v. M/s. Faridabad Gurgaon Minerals & Anr.
Commercial

State of Haryana & Ors. v. M/s. Faridabad Gurgaon Minerals & Anr.

(2026) INSC 690

Whether the State Government can enhance the rate of royalty and dead rent during the subsistence of a mining lease when the lease deed does not expressly provide for such enhancement, and whether such enhancement is valid under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964.

13 Jul 2026
Dipankar Datta J.
Mining leaseRoyalty enhancementDead rent
H.D.F.C. Bank Limited v. Kishore K. Mehta (Dead) Through L.Rs.
Commercial

H.D.F.C. Bank Limited v. Kishore K. Mehta (Dead) Through L.Rs.

(2026) INSC 688

Whether a recovery certificate issued by a Debts Recovery Tribunal under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (pre-2016 amendment) constitutes a 'decree or order' within the meaning of Section 9(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, so as to form the basis for issuance of an insolvency notice.

13 Jul 2026
Dipankar Datta J.
Insolvency noticeRecovery certificateDRT
State of Haryana & Ors. v. M/s. Jai Durgaa Finvest P. Ltd.
Commercial

State of Haryana & Ors. v. M/s. Jai Durgaa Finvest P. Ltd.

(2026) INSC 678

Whether the security deposit furnished by a contractor under a statutory contract will carry interest despite a specific contractual clause (Clause 19 of Form-L) that expressly states the deposit shall not carry any interest, and whether a High Court can declare such a clause unsustainable in law or against public policy.

13 Jul 2026
Surya Kant CJI
Contract interpretationSecurity depositInterest
State of Himachal Pradesh v. M/S Kundlas Loh Udyog
Commercial Premium

State of Himachal Pradesh v. M/S Kundlas Loh Udyog

(2026) INSC 534

Whether Clause 16(a) of the Himachal Pradesh Industrial Policy, 2019, which provided that 'eligible enterprises' would receive a 15% discount on energy charges for 3 years, was intended to apply to existing industrial enterprises undertaking substantial expansion or only to new industrial enterprises, and whether the amendment notification dated 29.04.2022 substituting 'eligible' with 'new' was clarificatory and retrospective or substantive and prospective.

25 May 2026
Justice J.B. Pardiwala
Industrial policyPromissory estoppelFiscal incentives
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited v. Talwandi Sabo Power Limited
Commercial Premium

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited v. Talwandi Sabo Power Limited

(2026) INSC 515

Whether the failure of a generating station to demonstrate its declared capacity (DC) when asked by the State Load Despatch Centre (SLDC) under Regulation 11.3.13 of the Punjab State Grid Code, 2013 constitutes a strict liability inviting penalty without proof of mens rea or illegal enrichment, and whether such demonstration must be achieved within the fourth time block from receipt of the notice under Regulation 11.5(xi).

20 May 2026
Justice Sanjay Kumar
Electricity Act 2003Grid CodeDeclared capacity
Join Group