Apex Digest

Join Group
Argument Lab/For Petitioner/Animal Welfare Organisations Seeking Modification of Directions — (2026) 1 SCC 774
For PetitionerConstitutional Premium

Animal Welfare Organisations Seeking Modification of Directions — (2026) 1 SCC 774

Rule 11(19) of the ABC Rules, 2023 mandates re-release of sterilised and vaccinated stray dogs to the same locality.

In Re: City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price — (2026) 1 SCC 774

Core Argument

Rule 11(19) of the ABC Rules, 2023 mandates re-release of sterilised and vaccinated stray dogs to the same locality. The Court's direction prohibiting re-release from institutional areas directly conflicts with statutory provisions and violates the fundamental principles underlying the ABC framework, including prevention of the 'vacuum effect'.

Key Precedents

  • Prem Chand Garg v. Excise Commr., 1962 SCC OnLine SC 10 — Constitution Bench held that power under Article 142(1) cannot be exercised to make an order inconsistent with statutory provisions or substantive law.
  • Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan (2023) 14 SCC 231 — Constitution Bench held that exercise of Article 142 power is prohibited when the order is plainly and expressly barred by statutory provisions based on fundamental principles of public policy.
  • Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India (1991) 4 SCC 584 — While affirming plenary nature of Article 142, this Court held that due regard must be had to statutory provisions founded on fundamental considerations of public policy.

This framework covers the complete step-by-step argument structure, opening submissions, key precedents to cite, how to distinguish adverse cases, and the exact prayer to draft. Subscribe to access the full courtroom argument framework with precedent mapping...

Premium Argument FrameworkSubscribers Only

Subscribe to unlock the full argument structure — precedent mapping, bench questions, opposition rebuttals, and court-ready prayer clauses.

Already subscribed? Sign in

Argument SimulatorAnnual Plan Only

BENCH QUESTION

What distinguishes this case from earlier precedents on the same point?

OPPOSITION COUNTER

The ratio in this case was expressly limited to its facts by the bench itself...

Unlock the Argument Simulator

4 probable bench questions with suggested answers.
4 opposition counters with rebuttal strategies.

Available on Annual, 2-Year & 3-Year plans only.

Upgrade to Annual Plan

Disclaimer: This argument framework is published by Agarawal Associates for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Adapt all submissions to the specific facts of your matter. © 2026 Agarawal Associates — apexdigest.in

Join Group