Apex Digest

Join Group
Argument Lab/For Petitioner/No Provision for Ad Interim Maintenance Under Section 125 — NaXXXX Kumar
For PetitionerCriminal Premium

No Provision for Ad Interim Maintenance Under Section 125 — NaXXXX Kumar

Section 125 CrPC has no provision for grant of ad-interim maintenance. The Family Court erred by equating ad-interim maintenance with interim maintenance without a specific application.

NaXXXX Kumar v. KaXXXX

Core Argument

Section 125 CrPC has no provision for grant of ad-interim maintenance. The Family Court erred by equating ad-interim maintenance with interim maintenance without a specific application. The order directing payment from the date of filing is contrary to Section 125(2) CrPC.

Key Precedents

  • Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324 — Supreme Court held that a concise application for interim maintenance along with Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities is mandatory; the Family Court cannot grant maintenance without such application.
  • Manish Divedi v. Jyotsana (2019 SCC OnLine Del 10492) — Delhi High Court distinguished ad-interim maintenance from interim maintenance, but held that ad-interim maintenance must be based on prima facie material; the Family Court here passed a detailed order after hearing, which is more than ad-interim.
  • Rajesh Chaudhary v. Nirmala Chaudhary (2006) 86 DRJ 61 — Held that ad-interim maintenance may be granted based on admitted income, but only where the respondent admits liability; the petitioner here never admitted liability.

This framework covers the complete step-by-step argument structure, opening submissions, key precedents to cite, how to distinguish adverse cases, and the exact prayer to draft. Subscribe to access the full courtroom argument framework with precedent mapping...

Premium Argument FrameworkSubscribers Only

Subscribe to unlock the full argument structure — precedent mapping, bench questions, opposition rebuttals, and court-ready prayer clauses.

Already subscribed? Sign in

Argument SimulatorAnnual Plan Only

BENCH QUESTION

What distinguishes this case from earlier precedents on the same point?

OPPOSITION COUNTER

The ratio in this case was expressly limited to its facts by the bench itself...

Unlock the Argument Simulator

4 probable bench questions with suggested answers.
4 opposition counters with rebuttal strategies.

Available on Annual, 2-Year & 3-Year plans only.

Upgrade to Annual Plan

Disclaimer: This argument framework is published by Agarawal Associates for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Adapt all submissions to the specific facts of your matter. © 2026 Agarawal Associates — apexdigest.in

Join Group