Demonstration of Declared Capacity Invites Strict Liability — (2026) INSC 515
Regulation 11.3.13 of the Punjab State Grid Code, 2013 imposes a strict liability penalty for failure to demonstrate declared capacity when asked by the SLDC.
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited v. Talwandi Sabo Power Limited — (2026) INSC 515Core Argument
Regulation 11.3.13 of the Punjab State Grid Code, 2013 imposes a strict liability penalty for failure to demonstrate declared capacity when asked by the SLDC. No finding of mens rea or illegal enrichment is required. The demonstration must be achieved within the fourth time block from receipt of notice under Regulation 11.5(xi).
Key Precedents
- Union of India v. Dharamendra Textile Processors (2008) 13 SCC 369 — Held that penalty arising from breach of civil obligation does not require proof of mens rea; the mere use of the word 'penalty' is not determinative of whether proceedings are criminal or quasi-criminal.
- Chairman, SEBI v. Sri Ram Mutual Fund (2006) 5 SCC 361 — Held that mens rea is not a straitjacket formula; the language and scheme of the Act determine whether mens rea is required for penalty.
Subscribe to unlock the full argument structure — precedent mapping, bench questions, opposition rebuttals, and court-ready prayer clauses.
Already subscribed? Sign in
BENCH QUESTION
What distinguishes this case from earlier precedents on the same point?
OPPOSITION COUNTER
The ratio in this case was expressly limited to its facts by the bench itself...
Unlock the Argument Simulator
4 probable bench questions with suggested answers.
4 opposition counters with rebuttal strategies.
Available on Annual, 2-Year & 3-Year plans only.
Upgrade to Annual PlanDisclaimer: This argument framework is published by Agarawal Associates for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Adapt all submissions to the specific facts of your matter. © 2026 Agarawal Associates — apexdigest.in