Agarawal Associates — Supreme Court of India  |  Legal Intelligence Platform

Argument Lab/For Petitioner/Written Grounds of Arrest Are Mandatory — (2025) INSC 1288
For PetitionerCriminal Premium

Written Grounds of Arrest Are Mandatory — (2025) INSC 1288

Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India and Section 47 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 mandate that grounds of arrest be furnished in writing in a language the arrestee…

Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra — (2025) INSC 1288

Core Argument

Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India and Section 47 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 mandate that grounds of arrest be furnished in writing in a language the arrestee understands. Oral communication is insufficient and violates fundamental rights.

Key Precedents

  • Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. (1994 INSC 170) — Established that arrest cannot be made in a routine manner and causes irreversible damage to reputation and self-esteem; the power to arrest must be exercised cautiously with recorded reasons.
  • Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014 INSC 463) — Held that arrest results in embarrassment, restricts freedom, leaves permanent scars, and that police must follow procedural safeguards before arresting for offences punishable with less than seven years.
  • D.K. Basu v. State of W.B. (1997) 1 SCC 416 — Laid down detailed requirements for arrest and detention, including the obligation to inform the arrestee of his rights and to record grounds of arrest in writing.

This framework covers the complete step-by-step argument structure, opening submissions, key precedents to cite, how to distinguish adverse cases, and the exact prayer to draft. Subscribe to access the full courtroom argument framework...

Premium Argument

Subscribe to access the full argument framework with precedent mapping and submission structure.

Subscribe to AccessAlready a subscriber? Sign in
Argument SimulatorAnnual Plan Only

BENCH QUESTION

What distinguishes this case from earlier precedents on the same point?

OPPOSITION COUNTER

The ratio in this case was expressly limited to its facts by the bench itself...

Unlock the Argument Simulator

4 probable bench questions with suggested answers.
4 opposition counters with rebuttal strategies.

Available on Annual, 2-Year & 3-Year plans only.

Upgrade to Annual Plan

Disclaimer: This argument framework is published by Agarawal Associates for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Adapt all submissions to the specific facts of your matter. © 2026 Agarawal Associates — apexdigest.in